Hi Walt,

I have 4 incomplete runs of 5, that I intend to complete gradually by the
deadline.
However, feel free to reassign any of them if necessary.

Regards,
Zsolt

Walter Nyland <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2018.
okt. 18., Cs 13:42):

>  There are no items denoted as "Completed 0%" that have issues raised for
> them.
> Can those who have multiple items assigned to them all at "Completed 0%"
> respond and say what their intentions are? Are they suddenly going to do
> all their tasks at once? Or should we just removed all those names that
> have "Completed 0%", especially where there is one name that has multiple
> of these assigned to them?
> Walt
>
>     On Thursday, October 18, 2018, 1:12:54 PM GMT+2, Daniel Warren <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>  I've noticed that some of the assigned tasks that have 0% completion but
> have issues raised for them at specific stages (any of the 0% Java
> editor tasks would be an example of this). It's my first time to be a
> part of NetCAT too, so I'm not sure if anyone would be able to elaborate
> on this at all, but might it be some people are looking at these
> assignments and not updating the %?
>
> I'd also like to take the opportunity to say that I'd be happy with
> having some of the 0% completed tasks assigned to me if they have not
> been worked on at all.
>
> Kind regards,
> Daniel Warren
>
> On 18/10/2018 09:41, Walter Nyland wrote:
> > It's the first time for me to be part of NetCAT, I am surprised at how
> simple it is to work through a spec, I work on it half an hour here and
> half an hour there, and hence I am surprised that there are so
> many "Completed 0%" in the list. Or are these people all planning to do
> them all at the very last second?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>

Reply via email to