Add notes and observations to mine here when you have them:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+11.0+Evaluation

Gj

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:39 PM Geertjan Wielenga <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Just focus on EE7.
>
> Gj
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:38 PM joe schmo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ok, I have vc3.
>>
>> Question, do I need to do all tests 3 times?  For Javae5,6,7 ?
>>
>> Instructions are:
>>
>> Setup: Test all J2EE project types for both JavaEE5 and JavaEE6. (and now
>> we have JavaEE7)
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> BC
>> ________________________________
>> From: Geertjan Wielenga <[email protected]>
>> Sent: March 13, 2019 6:39 AM
>> To: joe schmo
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: need another spec to test
>>
>> Done. Make sure to use vc3.
>>
>> Thanks for your work,
>>
>> Gj
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:33 AM joe schmo <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> I can look at this one
>> http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specification/266/v/2
>> ________________________________
>> From: Geertjan Wielenga <[email protected]<mailto:
>> [email protected]>>
>> Sent: March 13, 2019 5:14 AM
>> To: joe schmo
>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: need another spec to test
>>
>> Thanks for all your work. The issue, I've looked at it, definitely not
>> blocker or major, but basically we need to work through all the test specs
>> from scratch again to see whether they still apply -- i.e., if the spec
>> itself is out of date then we're going to be getting false positive issues.
>>
>> In which area or which specific test spec would you like to do next:
>> http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/run/30/v/2
>>
>> Gj
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:54 AM joe schmo <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:
>> [email protected]>>> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've finished the JUnit test spec, I have skipped a lot of tests, partly
>> because the focus is on Maven but for other reasons as well, for example
>>
>> Note from Rick: Skip this test case! I need to do some research on why it
>> is here.
>>
>> If I were qualified I would offer to help work on that spec.
>> Also, I have raised an issue which I think is major, not sure what
>> qualifies as a "Blocker" but here it is
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2248?filter=-2
>>
>> I am available to test another spec, not sure I will finish in the next 5
>> days but I'll give it a shot.
>>
>> BC
>>
>

Reply via email to