Note though that the ZIP is focused specifically on the Java SE features of
NetBeans IDE. That's the focus of NetCAT 9.0, not JavaScript, not Java EE,
not C/C++, not Groovy etc. So, yes, it will not be usable for many
scenarios -- only very specifically Java SE. The other features are coming
later.

Gj

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 5:59 PM, Scott Palmer <swpal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I didn’t track exactly which ones I manually selected and they brought in
> many more as dependencies it seems.
>
> HTML support, JavaScript, JSON, and REST were what I was looking at when I
> choose what to install.
>
> I have a log of the console output from my run of “ant tryme”, but I don’t
> see anywhere to attach it to the exception report.
>
> I’m attaching all of the “Unpack” lines from that log, which hopefully
> gives an idea of what actually got installed. (Copying you directly in case
> attachments aren’t allowed on the list)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Scott
>
>
> > On Jun 14, 2017, at 11:13 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
> geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Can you be specific about which plugins you added.
> >
> > Gj
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Scott Palmer <swpal...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Build went well on macOS 10.12.5 w. Java 8u131
> >>
> >>
> >> Scotts-MacBook-Pro:netbeans-donation-review scott$ ant build
> >> -Dcluster.config=java
> >> …
> >> BUILD SUCCESSFUL
> >> Total time: 76 minutes 23 seconds
> >> Scotts-MacBook-Pro:netbeans-donation-review scott$ ant tryme
> >> …
> >>
> >> However...
> >>
> >> I couldn’t open the project I wanted to try as it wasn’t understood yet
> >> without some plugins, so I added a few HTML and JavaScript plugins.  The
> >> project loads but NetBeans throws an exception when I try to open any
> file
> >> (tried with .java, .html, and .js) in the editor.
> >>
> >> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/openide/windows/ModeSelector
> >>
> >> It is unusable for me. :-(
> >>
> >> Bug #853568 reported
> >> http://statistics.netbeans.org/analytics/exception.do?id=853568
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Scott
>

Reply via email to