On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:53:46 -0400 of [EMAIL PROTECTED] pontificated on the subject of Re: [netconnect] Re: MDII inverted scrollbar gadgets shocker!: > "Chris Wiles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/17/99 04:56:35 AM > > > or standard applications! Voyager is fine ... and we all know how > > > buggy that thing is! > > > Erm? We do? I wouldn't say it was 'buggy' as you define it. Sure there are a > > couple or things missing from the HTML support, but the definition of > > 'buggy' is a different thing entirely. > > > I find it quite sad that someone can state '..and we all know *how* > > buggy..', a clear over-exaggeration. > > You must not actually use Voyager that much then. It is extremely buggy. So > many irritation were obvious the first time I used it, like: > > 1) Clicking on a link or entering a URL that doesn't exist will confuses the > state of the back history. Hitting the back button then causes the URL display > to show the previously displayed URL, but the display will go back also to the > previous to the previous URL. Whenever this happens, I have to exit and restart > Voyager, then gstep though the sites again to get back where I was. Agreed that this sometimes plays up, although I have not yet had to restart the whole thing to sort it out. > 2) Shift clicking to start to start a second download while one is in progress > "acts" like it is doing both simultaneously, but the data in the second file is > total trash. If simultaneous downloads are not supported, the the software > should not proceed like it does, it should queue up the request or give an error > message. Totally disagree with this one. I have often had as many as 8 or 9 simiultaneous downloads. Admitted, they all slow down to a crawl, but they are all fine when the process has finished. -- �������������������������� **** Nimrod **** �������������������������� _____________________________________________________________ NetConnect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an 'unsubcribe' message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
