> On 13-Feb-00, Tony Rolfe wrote: > > > On 5 Feb 2000 21:54:02 +0000 Michael Inkpen said: > > >>> I am 52 years old and by no means a computer whiz kid. > >> > >> Same here, not a pace modem though, but I am 52 > > > > Me too (at least 52 in March...) Bunch of old fogeys aren't we!! > > It's a well known and scientifically proven fact that 1948 was the > best vintage of the century. > Sorry to disagree, but you will find that 1944 was the best year, that is when us prototypes were born :-) Regards Gerry 56 and rising or is it declining -- Gerry Harris
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A Active Bob
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A Active Michael Inkpen
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A Active Tony Rolfe
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A Active Patrick Ford
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A Acti... Neil Bothwick
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A ... Patrick Ford
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW... Neil Bothwick
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs... John Chandler
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A ... Paul Cundle
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW... Neil Bothwick
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A Acti... Gerry Harris
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A ... Jason Murray
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW... Dirk Harlaar
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs... Patrick Ford
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW... John Chandler
- [netconnect] Re: Those were th... Samuel Byford
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A Active Alexander Birrell
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A Acti... David
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A ... Andrew Tait
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW... Daniel V. Smith
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs... Andrew Tait
