Kevin Fairhurst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 30 May 2000 10:33:02 +0100:
>
> On 29 May 2000 23:38:12 +0100, ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > > 2. There is no cachebrowser and won't be one (soon) as the guy who was
> > > creating it disappeared...along with the code/source.
> >
> > Well simply converting the old Cache Browser to work with V3 would be a
> > acceptable stopgap until to new & improved one could be written. That
> > shouldn't be too difficult - Would it? :-)
>
> Read what was written. The guy vanished with the source code. Without the
> source code, you can't alter the source code to adapt it to V�. No source
> code means either a) starting from scratch or b) not bothering cos it's too
> much hassle.
That's not exactly what was said. I read that as he disappeared with the *new*
cache browser source that was being written for V3, not the old V2 version
which, I assume, is still held by Olli, and hence, could be converted to accept
the differences between V3 & V2 cached files.
V2 has one, IB2 has one, AWeb3 has one. V3 doesn't. Some may not use it much,
but some certainly do. I'd say it's worth 'the hassle.'
--
Cheers
Wayne
_____________________________________________________________
NetConnect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an 'unsubcribe'
message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
