From: Babu Moger <[email protected]>

The array subscript increments after the execution of the statement.
So there is no issue here. However it helps to read the code better.

Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
index 918b94b..f2837ea 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
@@ -3084,7 +3084,7 @@ static void ixgbe_free_irq(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
                free_irq(entry->vector, q_vector);
        }
 
-       free_irq(adapter->msix_entries[vector++].vector, adapter);
+       free_irq(adapter->msix_entries[vector].vector, adapter);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.5.5

Reply via email to