On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 04:00:27PM +0100, Volodymyr Bendiuga wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> thanks for you comments and time taken to review. I will make a new
>
> version which will indicate net-next tree.
>
> About mv88e6xxx_remove(), this function will not be called
Correct, which is why i said:
> and the error path of mv88e6xxx_probe().
which will be called on EPRODE_DEFFER.
> irq_dispose_mapping() is also called in mv88e6xxx_g2_irq_free(), so
> I put it in a similar
The mapping for chip->device_irq is made in mv88e6xxx_g2_irq_setup(),
so the disposal of the mapping logically goes in
mv88e6xxx_g2_irq_free().
Andrew
