On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:00:20PM +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>> b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>> index 936d7ee..f88b6ed 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>> @@ -170,6 +170,41 @@ virtio_transport_send_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt)
>> return len;
>> }
>>
>> +static int
>> +virtio_transport_cancel_pkt(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
>> +{
>> + struct virtio_vsock *vsock;
>> + struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt, *n;
>> + int cnt = 0;
>> + LIST_HEAD(freeme);
>> +
>> + vsock = virtio_vsock_get();
>> + if (!vsock) {
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (pkt->reply)
>
> pkt is uninitialized. I guess this if statement should be deleted, you
> already take care of counting reply packets below.
>
ah, sorry! I forgot to delete it after handling cnt below...
>> + cnt++;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(pkt, n, &vsock->send_pkt_list, list) {
>> + if (pkt->vsk != vsk)
>> + continue;
>> + list_move(&pkt->list, &freeme);
>> + }
>> + spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(pkt, n, &freeme, list) {
>> + if (pkt->reply)
>> + cnt++;
>> + list_del(&pkt->list);
>> + virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
>> + }
>> + atomic_sub(cnt, &vsock->queued_replies);
>
> If we stopped rx because there were too many replies in flight then we
> might be able to resume rx now:
>
> /* Do we now have resources to resume rx processing? */
> if (old_val >= virtqueue_get_vring_size(rx_vq) &&
> new_val < virtqueue_get_vring_size(rx_vq))
> queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->rx_work);
Thanks! I totally missed the resume part... I'll send an updated version later.
Cheers,
Tao
