On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 04:18:54PM +0000, Tung, Chien Tin wrote:
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 11:12 AM
> > To: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Doug Ledford <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Tung,
> > Chien Tin <[email protected]>; Steve Wise
> > <[email protected]>; Stephen Hemminger
> > <[email protected]>; Jiri Pirko <[email protected]>; Ariel Almog
> > <[email protected]>; Linux Netdev <[email protected]>; Leon
> > Romanovsky <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 13/19] RDMA/netlink: Add netlink device
> > definitions to UAPI
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:05:22AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > >   RDMA_NL_IWCM,
> > >   RDMA_NL_RSVD,
> > >   RDMA_NL_LS,     /* RDMA Local Services */
> > > + /*
> > > +  * RDMA_NL_I40IW not in use and it was added here by mistake,
> > > +  * but we need to keep it anyway, because it is UAPI and for
> > > +  * unknown reasons, someone in the field decided to replace "5"
> > > +  * with this define.
> > > +  */
> > >   RDMA_NL_I40IW,
> >
> > Since this doesn't do anything, never did anything, I think you should just
> > delete it. Anything in userspace that refers to this name is unconditionally
> > broken and a compile failure is the better choice.
> >
> > Jason
>
> I agree.  Please delete RDMA_NL_I40IW.

Fixed and Steve's comments too.

Thanks

>
> Chien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to