Cong Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > rateest_hash is supposed to be protected by xt_rateest_mutex, > and, as suggested by Eric, lookup and insert should be atomic, > so we should acquire the xt_rateest_mutex once for both. > > So introduce a non-locking helper for internal use and keep the > locking one for external.
Looks good, thanks Cong. Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
