Another option is to pass in an 'authorizer' much like the 'resolver' is
provided by the caller.
Regards,
Trent.
------------------------------------------------------------
Trent Jaeger
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
19 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532
(914) 784-7225, FAX (914) 784-7225
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
07/11/2005 11:42 PM
To: Trent Jaeger/Watson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Serge E
Hallyn/Austin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] LSM-IPSec Networking Hooks
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 11:35:13AM -0400, Trent Jaeger wrote:
>
> Shall I submit the patch with the authorization?
Let me think about this for a while.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
