On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 11:26:07AM +0000, Bart De Schuymer wrote:

> I don't think your patch will satisfy the simple and rational demand of
> people using userspace logging on a bridging firewall: they like to know
> what bridge port the packet arrived at/will leave by. These are the
> physindev and physoutdev members of the struct ebt_ulog_packet_msg.

Ok, I'll extend nfnetlink_log.c to add TLV's for those two fields in
case CONFIG_BRIDGE_NF is set.  I'll send a patch later tonight.

> Apart from that, I have no objection with introducing incompatibilities
> between the output from the old ebt_ulog and the new one using generic
> functions; as long as there is no information loss.

fine :)

-- 
- Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                      http://gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

Attachment: pgp6PeLarZoWP.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to