From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 08:36:41 +0900 (JST)

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 06 Sep 2005 13:05:16 -0700), Ben 
> Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> 
> >                     neigh->nud_state     = NUD_INCOMPLETE;
> > ***                 neigh_hold(neigh, NDRK_NEIGH_TIMER);
> >                     neigh->timer.expires = now + 1;
> >                     add_timer(&neigh->timer);
> :
> > Shouldn't we always do something similar to neigh->nud_state |= NUD_IN_TIMER
> > before calling the add_timer() method?
> 
> NUD_IN_TIMER has a bit of NUD_INCOMPLETE.

Right, so this isn't the bug and Ben's patch wasn't fixing
anything.  Ho hum...


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to