jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am afraid I would have to agree with Stefan on this Krzysztof.
Supporting false statements doesn't make them less false :-) OTOH I hope your opinions about people have no influence on your view of the code they write so it's not exactly important here. > You are > contributing some valuable ideas, but you are almost sounding like a > broken record on your super-patch. There is nothing like a super-patch, my own or another. The facts are my patch is not invasive and doesn't change the (currently well working) mechanism. It's just an extension to it. And it actually works correctly. If you or whoever comes with a better patch I'll be more than happy to burn my own version immediately. Now all you have is endless discussions and I'm really tired of it. > Your patch fixes your driver, no > doubt Of course, no. No my driver is broken (at least WRT to the flags etc), it's the kernel which is (has been recently) broken. > - but we have bigger issues at stake here. You keep mapping > anything that isnt to clear to you as not "being needed". False. The only thing I think isn't needed are the complications with automatic UP->DORMANT transitions. > We are close, > just stop mentioning your super-patch ;-> Let me know when you're have something. Being close isn't at all worth mentioning. -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
