On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:00:44PM +0200, andrei.popa wrote: > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 07:47 -0500, Neil Horman wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:26:41PM +0200, andrei.popa wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > I've reported this problem once > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/10/26/85 > > > > > > I've googled and I found another person who has the same problem: > > > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0406.2/1981.html > > > > > > static ARP doesnt work: > > > > > > it ~ # ping 192.168.2.59 > > > PING 192.168.2.59 (192.168.2.59) 56(84) bytes of data. > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.59: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=0.786 ms > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.59: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=1.36 ms > > > --- 192.168.2.59 ping statistics --- > > > 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1014ms > > > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.786/1.077/1.369/0.293 ms > > > > > > > > > it ~ # arp -an 192.168.2.59 > > > ? (192.168.2.59) at 00:00:E8:DE:7D:A0 [ether] on eth1 > > > > > > > > > it ~ # arp -s 192.168.2.59 00:11:22:33:44:55 > > > > > > > > > it ~ # arp -an 192.168.2.59 > > > ? (192.168.2.59) at 00:11:22:33:44:55 [ether] PERM on eth1 > > > > > > > > > it ~ # ping 192.168.2.59 > > > PING 192.168.2.59 (192.168.2.59) 56(84) bytes of data. > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.59: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=2.99 ms > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.59: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=2.77 ms > > > --- 192.168.2.59 ping statistics --- > > > 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1011ms > > > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.773/2.881/2.990/0.121 ms > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > > > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > Both problem reports seem to be against older kernels. I just tried this > > against 2.6.15, and it works fine. I imagine if you looked through the git > > history you could find the patch that fixed it up. > > > > Regards > > Neil > > This was done on a 2.6.14 ! Your bug report indicates the problem was filed against 2.6.13, which, while recent, is still a few months old. The other lkml thread you referenced indicates the problem occured on a 2.6.7 box (very old).
> > I'll test on a 2.6.15. > Please do. If the problem persists, send me your kernel config, and I'll retry here. Regards Neil -- /*************************************************** *Neil Horman *Software Engineer *gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1 - http://pgp.mit.edu ***************************************************/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
