In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:59:35 +0100), Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote: : > > BTW, we're now using full of skb->cb > > (and we are even exceeding it w/ mobile-ipv6 extensions)... > > Not in mainline so far, so maybe we can fit your extensions > and my patches without the mobile extensions, that apparently > exceed the CB anyway, in there for now. Can I look at those > patches somewhere? BTW, other fields in the IP6CB seem to > store offsets in u16 fields, is this OK for nhoff too? I > thought with jumbo options I need to use a u32 field. Well, don't mind too much. I just wanted to note that we're about to exceed skb->cb. I will probably enlarge skb->cb if needed. And, yes, good point. I think nhoff should be u32 because it is critical. In theory, u32 is definitely needed for others as well... --yoshfuji - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
