On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 05:08:23PM +0100, Roberto Nibali wrote: > >>Sidenote: At first I was a bit confused as to why this broke since my > >>local copy of IPVS still works. But to be honest, I would like to clean > >>up the IPVS headers in general. I believe we can cut short maybe half of > >>the includes in the various ip_vs* modules. > > > >Cool, if nobody beats me to it I'll eventually get to cleanup the > >header usage in > >ipvs, but its not something pressing, I just don't like the include > >hell and from time > >to time clean it up a bit when adding new abstractions :-) > > Go for it, some of the headers are remnants of the 2.4 kernel and said > new abstractions. I will try to move some functionality into ip_vs.h, > which should be the only place with a large number of includes anyway. > > Of course Horms has to ack all of this, but I don't think he'll object, > so long as everything still compiles and works like before. BTW, Adrian, > if you have some time and lust and haven't gone through the ../ipvs/ > directory yet, your excellent cleanups are also very much appreciated :).
Indeed, I have no objections to cleanups in ipvs/ -- Horms - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
