From: "Kris Katterjohn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 13:01:54 -0800
> From: Patrick McHardy > Sent: 1/6/2006 12:52:34 PM > > > Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Patrick McHardy wrote: > > > > > >>>--- x/net/atm/br2684.c 2006-01-02 21:21:10.000000000 -0600 > > >>>+++ y/net/atm/br2684.c 2006-01-06 12:34:47.000000000 -0600 > > >>>@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static inline __be16 br_type_trans(struc > > >>> unsigned char *rawp; > > >>> eth = eth_hdr(skb); > > >>> > > >>>- if (*eth->h_dest & 1) { > > >>>+ if (is_multicast_ether_addr(eth->h_dest)) { > > >> > > >>This is not equivalent, is_multicast_ether_addr() ignores > > >>addresses starting with 0xff. > > > > > > It used to. Not today afaict. > > > > You're right, Stephen changed it two days ago. > > That's why I said the newer is_multicast_ether_addr(). Sorry for the > confusion. Applied, thanks Kris. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html