On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:21:42AM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> I experienced the same today, I was planning to get a photo tomorrow :)
> I'm running 2.6.16-rc1-mm2 and the last working kernel was 2.6.15-mm4
> (didn't try .16-rc1-mm1 being scared of the reiserfs breakage).

I think that's because the latest driver version wants to wait for
the ucode download, and e100_exec_cb_wait before allocating any
control blocks.

static inline int e100_exec_cb_wait(struct nic *nic, struct sk_buff *skb,
        void (*cb_prepare)(struct nic *, struct cb *, struct sk_buff *))
{
        int err = 0, counter = 50;
        struct cb *cb = nic->cb_to_clean;

        if ((err = e100_exec_cb(nic, NULL, e100_setup_ucode)))
                DPRINTK(PROBE,ERR, "ucode cmd failed with error %d\n", err);
        /* NOTE: the oops shows that e100_exec_cb fails with ENOMEM,
         * which also means there are no cbs */

        /* ... other stuff...
         * and then we die here because cb is NULL: */
        while (!(cb->status & cpu_to_le16(cb_complete))) {
                msleep(10);
                if (!--counter) break;
        }

I'm not sure what the right fix would be. e100_resume would probably
have to call e100_alloc_cbs early on, while e100_up should avoid
calling it a second time if nic->cbs_avail != 0. A tentative patch
for testing is attached.

Olaf
-- 
Olaf Kirch   |  --- o --- Nous sommes du soleil we love when we play
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |    / | \   sol.dhoop.naytheet.ah kin.ir.samse.qurax
[PATCH] e100: allocate cbs early on when resuming

Signed-off-by: Olaf Kirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 drivers/net/e100.c |   14 +++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: build/drivers/net/e100.c
===================================================================
--- build.orig/drivers/net/e100.c
+++ build/drivers/net/e100.c
@@ -1298,8 +1298,10 @@ static inline int e100_exec_cb_wait(stru
        int err = 0, counter = 50;
        struct cb *cb = nic->cb_to_clean;
 
-       if ((err = e100_exec_cb(nic, NULL, e100_setup_ucode)))
+       if ((err = e100_exec_cb(nic, NULL, e100_setup_ucode))) {
                DPRINTK(PROBE,ERR, "ucode cmd failed with error %d\n", err);
+               return err;
+       }
 
        /* must restart cuc */
        nic->cuc_cmd = cuc_start;
@@ -1721,9 +1723,11 @@ static int e100_alloc_cbs(struct nic *ni
        struct cb *cb;
        unsigned int i, count = nic->params.cbs.count;
 
+       /* bail out if we've been here before */
+       if (nic->cbs_avail)
+               return 0;
+
        nic->cuc_cmd = cuc_start;
-       nic->cb_to_use = nic->cb_to_send = nic->cb_to_clean = NULL;
-       nic->cbs_avail = 0;
 
        nic->cbs = pci_alloc_consistent(nic->pdev,
                sizeof(struct cb) * count, &nic->cbs_dma_addr);
@@ -2578,6 +2582,8 @@ static int __devinit e100_probe(struct p
        nic->pdev = pdev;
        nic->msg_enable = (1 << debug) - 1;
        pci_set_drvdata(pdev, netdev);
+       nic->cb_to_use = nic->cb_to_send = nic->cb_to_clean = NULL;
+       nic->cbs_avail = 0;
 
        if((err = pci_enable_device(pdev))) {
                DPRINTK(PROBE, ERR, "Cannot enable PCI device, aborting.\n");
@@ -2752,6 +2758,8 @@ static int e100_resume(struct pci_dev *p
        retval = pci_enable_wake(pdev, 0, 0);
        if (retval)
                DPRINTK(PROBE,ERR, "Error clearing wake events\n");
+       if ((retval = e100_alloc_cbs(nic)))
+               DPRINTK(PROBE,ERR, "No memory for cbs\n");
        if(e100_hw_init(nic))
                DPRINTK(HW, ERR, "e100_hw_init failed\n");
 

Reply via email to