On 2016/3/30 13:34, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 22:25 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 13:16 +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
When task A hold the sk owned in tcp_sendmsg, if lots of packets
arrive and the packets will be added to backlog queue. The packets
will be handled in release_sock called from tcp_sendmsg. When the
sk_backlog is removed from sk, the length will not decrease until
all the packets in backlog queue are handled. This may leads to the
new packets be dropped because the lenth is too big. So set the
lenth to 0 immediately after it's detached from sk.
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingli...@huawei.com>
---
net/core/sock.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 47fc8bb..108be05 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1933,6 +1933,7 @@ static void __release_sock(struct sock *sk)
do {
sk->sk_backlog.head = sk->sk_backlog.tail = NULL;
+ sk->sk_backlog.len = 0;
bh_unlock_sock(sk);
do {
Certainly not.
Have you really missed the comment ?
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8eae939f1400326b06d0c9afe53d2a484a326871
I do not believe the case you describe can happen, unless a misbehaving
driver cooks fat skb (with skb->truesize being far more bigger than
skb->len)
And also make sure you backported
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=da882c1f2ecadb0ed582628ec1585e36b137c0f0
Sorry, I made a mistake. I am very sure my kernel has these two patches.
And I can get some dropping of the packets in 10Gb eth.
# netstat -s | grep -i backlog
TCPBacklogDrop: 4135
# netstat -s | grep -i backlog
TCPBacklogDrop: 4167
