On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to
sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get
covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to
quickly tag the precise problem.
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]>
Makes sense. Looks like ppc jit will be using quite a bit of
available ppc instructions. Nice.
I'm assuming all these new tests passed with x64 jit?
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>