2016-04-08 7:19 GMT-07:00 Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 16:48 -0700, Michael Ma wrote:
>> I didn't really know that multiple qdiscs can be isolated using MQ so
>> that each txq can be associated with a particular qdisc. Also we don't
>> really have multiple interfaces...
>>
>> With this MQ solution we'll still need to assign transmit queues to
>> different classes by doing some math on the bandwidth limit if I
>> understand correctly, which seems to be less convenient compared with
>> a solution purely within HTB.
>>
>> I assume that with this solution I can still share qdisc among
>> multiple transmit queues - please let me know if this is not the case.
>
> Note that this MQ + HTB thing works well, unless you use a bonding
> device. (Or you need the MQ+HTB on the slaves, with no way of sharing
> tokens between the slaves)
>
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bb1d912323d5dd50e1079e389f4e964be14f0ae3
>
> bonding can not really be used as a true MQ device yet.
>
> I might send a patch to disable this 'bonding feature' if no slave sets
> a queue_id.
>
>
So there is no way of using this MQ solution when bonding interface is
used, right? Then modifying HTB might be the only solution?
