> > +static __net_init int hwsim_init_net(struct net *net)
> > +{
> > +   struct mac80211_hwsim_data *data;
> > +   bool exists = true;
> > +   int netgroup = 0;
> > +
> > +   spin_lock_bh(&hwsim_radio_lock);
> > +   while (exists) {
> > +           exists = false;
> > +           list_for_each_entry(data, &hwsim_radios, list) {
> > +                   if (netgroup == data->netgroup) {
> > +                           exists = true;
> > +                           netgroup++;
> > +                           break;
> > +                   }
> > +           }
> > +   }
> > +   spin_unlock_bh(&hwsim_radio_lock);
> > +
> > +   *(int *)net_generic(net, hwsim_net_id) = netgroup;
> 
> This seems somewhat awkward. Why not just take the maximum of all the
> netgroup IDs + 1? We'd run out of memory and radio IDs long before
> netgroup IDs even that way

My intention was to reuse netgroups for the case many namespaces come
and go, but I agree that it is not optimal.

> consider a new netns that doesn't have any hwsim radios yet.
> Now you create *another* one, but it would get the same netgroup.

Correct, that is indeed broken if there are no radios.

> IOW, you should simply use a global counter. Surprising (net)
> namespaces don't have an index like that already, but I don't see
> one.

Ok, will do that in a v2.

> > +static void __net_exit hwsim_exit_net(struct net *net)
> > +{
> > +   struct mac80211_hwsim_data *entry, *tmp;
> > +
> > +   spin_lock_bh(&hwsim_radio_lock);
> > +   list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &hwsim_radios, list) {
> > +           if (net_eq(wiphy_net(entry->hw->wiphy), net)) {
> > +                   list_del(&entry->list);
> > +                   INIT_WORK(&entry->destroy_work, destroy_radio);
> > +                   schedule_work(&entry->destroy_work);
> > +           }
> > +   }
> > +   spin_unlock_bh(&hwsim_radio_lock);
> > +}

> This changes today's default behaviour of moving the wiphys to the
> default namespace. Did you intend to destroy them based on the
> netgroup, i.e. based on the namespace that created them? Actually,
> maybe they should move back to the namespace that created them, if
> the namespace they are in is destroyed? But that's difficult, I don't
> mind this behaviour, but I'm not sure it's what we want by default
> for radios created in the init_net.

With the proposed approach I destroy all radios if the owning namespace
gets deleted, because we probably don't want them landing in init_net
if they are created from a (unprivileged) userns process. I think this
is what other "virtual" interfaces do (gre tunnels, veth etc.). If we
think of hwsim radios as such a "virtual" device, that makes IMO sense
to delete them.

If we want to keep the existing behavior, we could move radios
belonging to the init_net-associated netgroup back to init_net, that
shouldn't be too difficult.

Moving the radio back to the creators namespace would be the most
consistent behavior, so I'll check how difficult such a reverse lookup
is. We then would delete the radio only if it is in the creators
namespace, or if the creators namespace is gone. Does that make sense?

Martin

Reply via email to