On Wed, 04 May 2016 23:08:11 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
> > But I'm less comfortable making the call on this one. It looks > > relatively straight forward, but it would be good to have maintainer > > acks before I add it to my tree. > > Agreed. Feel free to add my > > Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > > at least (whoever picks it up). In reply to [1/3] John said : Looks ok at the first glance. I've queued these up for testing, : however I only got #1 and #3 of the set. Are you hoping these two : patches will go through tip/timers/core or are you looking for acks so : they can go via another tree? However none of the patches are in linux-next. John had qualms about [2/3], but it looks like a straightforward substitution in areas which will get plenty of testing I'll grab the patches for now to get them some external testing.
