On 16-06-01 01:03 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 06/01/2016 06:50 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> Add translator for JITing eBPF to operations which
>> can be executed on NFP's programmable engines.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicin...@netronome.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Dinan Gunawardena <dgunaward...@netronome.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.hor...@netronome.com>
> [...]
>> +int
>> +nfp_bpf_jit(struct bpf_prog *filter, void *prog_mem, unsigned int
>> prog_start,
>> + unsigned int tgt_out, unsigned int tgt_abort,
>> + unsigned int prog_sz, struct nfp_bpf_result *res)
>> +{
>> + struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /* TODO: maybe make this dependent on bpf_jit_enable? */
>
> Probably makes sense to leave it independent from this.
Agreed we have an ethtool flag for the other offloads I think this
should just follow the same semantics and get offloaded if the flag
is set.
>
> Maybe that would rather be an ethtool flag/setting?
>
I would think using the same flag as we did for u32 and flower
should be fine.
