On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 04:14:54PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Now that we can properly support multiple distinct trees in the system,
> using a global variable: dsa_cpu_port_ethtool_ops is getting clobbered
> as soon as the second switch tree gets probed, and we don't want that.
>
> We need to move this to be dynamically allocated, and since we can't
> really be comparing addresses anymore to determine first time
> initialization versus any other times, just move this to dsa.c and
> dsa2.c where the remainder of the dst/ds initialization happens.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/dsa/dsa.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/dsa/dsa2.c | 4 ++++
> net/dsa/dsa_priv.h | 2 ++
> net/dsa/slave.c | 10 ----------
> 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> index ce3b942dce76..37026f04ee4d 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> @@ -266,6 +266,30 @@ const struct dsa_device_ops
> *dsa_resolve_tag_protocol(int tag_protocol)
> return ops;
> }
>
> +int dsa_cpu_port_ethtool_setup(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
> + struct dsa_switch *ds)
> +{
> + struct net_device *master;
> + struct ethtool_ops *cpu_ops;
> +
> + master = ds->dst->master_netdev;
> + if (ds->master_netdev)
> + master = ds->master_netdev;
> +
> + cpu_ops = devm_kzalloc(ds->dev, sizeof(*cpu_ops), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cpu_ops)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + memcpy(&dst->master_ethtool_ops, master->ethtool_ops,
> + sizeof(struct ethtool_ops));
> + memcpy(cpu_ops, &dst->master_ethtool_ops,
> + sizeof(struct ethtool_ops));
> + dsa_cpu_port_ethtool_init(cpu_ops);
> + master->ethtool_ops = cpu_ops;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Hi Florian
Why is there not a symmetrical dsa_cpu_port_ethertool_destroy method,
which will restore master->ethtool_ops when the switch module is
unloaded. I think at the moment, you end up with master->ethtool_ops
pointing at released memory.
Andrew
