On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 09:50:48PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote: > I realize that in_cgroup is more consistent, but under_cgroup makes > far more sense to me. I think it's more intuitive.
So, I think in_cgroup should mean that the object is in that particular cgroup while under_cgroup in the subhierarchy of that cgroup. Let's rename the other subhierarchy test to under too. I think that'd be a lot less confusing going forward. Thanks. -- tejun
