On 16-08-14 01:03 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 4:33 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <j...@mojatatu.com> wrote:
Just minor comment below:
On 16-08-11 08:41 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
+static inline void
+tcf_exts_to_list(const struct tcf_exts *exts, struct list_head *actions)
+{
to:
static inline void tcf_exts_to_list(const struct tcf_exts *exts,
struct list_head *actions)
I don't disagree, just want to point out that other functions
in this header use similar indention. I am fine with either.
True - but if you introduce a new one you should use new style
(and it is an opportunity to fix the others).
Thanks for being dilligent on this. I dont have time to test the patches
for about a day but i see no reason to delay them, so I will proceed to
do so.
cheers,
jamal
