Hi Vivien
> -static int _mv88e6xxx_port_fdb_dump_one(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
> - u16 fid, u16 vid, int port,
> - struct switchdev_obj_port_fdb *fdb,
> - int (*cb)(struct switchdev_obj *obj))
> +static int mv88e6xxx_port_db_dump_one(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
> + u16 fid, u16 vid, int port,
> + struct switchdev_obj *obj,
> + int (*cb)(struct switchdev_obj *obj))
> {
> struct mv88e6xxx_atu_entry addr = {
> .mac = { 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff },
> @@ -2222,72 +2219,87 @@ static int _mv88e6xxx_port_fdb_dump_one(struct
> mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
> do {
> err = _mv88e6xxx_atu_getnext(chip, fid, &addr);
> if (err)
> - break;
> + return err;
>
> if (addr.state == GLOBAL_ATU_DATA_STATE_UNUSED)
> break;
>
> - if (!addr.trunk && addr.portv_trunkid & BIT(port)) {
> - bool is_static = addr.state ==
> - (is_multicast_ether_addr(addr.mac) ?
> - GLOBAL_ATU_DATA_STATE_MC_STATIC :
> - GLOBAL_ATU_DATA_STATE_UC_STATIC);
> + if (addr.trunk || (addr.portv_trunkid & BIT(port)) == 0)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (obj->id == SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_FDB) {
> + struct switchdev_obj_port_fdb *fdb;
>
> + if (!is_unicast_ether_addr(addr.mac))
> + continue;
> +
> + fdb = SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_FDB(obj);
> fdb->vid = vid;
> ether_addr_copy(fdb->addr, addr.mac);
> - fdb->ndm_state = is_static ? NUD_NOARP : NUD_REACHABLE;
> -
> - err = cb(&fdb->obj);
> - if (err)
> - break;
> + if (addr.state == GLOBAL_ATU_DATA_STATE_UC_STATIC)
> + fdb->ndm_state = NUD_NOARP;
> + else
> + fdb->ndm_state = NUD_REACHABLE;
> }
> +
> + err = cb(obj);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> } while (!is_broadcast_ether_addr(addr.mac));
Humm, maybe i'm reading this patch wrong....
This function is called mv88e6xxx_port_db_dump_one(). But i don't see
a way out of the while loop, after dumping one. It seems to dump the
whole table until it reaches the end marker, which is the MAC
broadcast address.
Should we rename this function, drop the _one?
Andrew
