On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 09:32 -0700, Greg Rose wrote: > I'm not sure why this hasn't been done before because it seems obvious, > so maybe there is some reason that memcpy is used instead of > ether_addr_copy in this code. But let's try this anyway. > > Change memcpy to ether_addr_copy.
I looked at this once and gave up given the need to verify all the possible callers that require an __aligned(2) source address.
