On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Rick Jones <rick.jon...@hpe.com> wrote:

> Are there better than epsilon odds of someone perhaps wanting to poke those
> values as it gets exposure beyond Google?

This does not matter.

A change would require patching net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c , and the 'const'
attribute being there or not does not prevent the change.

I was simply asking to Stephen if the compiler would actually emit a
very different code, worth doing a last minute change.

The main BBR costs are divides and some multiplies , and they are
using per socket fields.

Reply via email to