On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 15:41 +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> I found this during working on the file and actually saw no live issues
> (belonged to another series which I just split up).
> I don't think it is a big issue but wanted the writes to the
> rtnl_msg_handlers array to be strictly serialized. I was working on
> adding this to other places, too. Maybe better for net-next even?
Sure, and you probably could enforce an ASSERT_RTNL() in rtnl_register()
to catch all offenders.