On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 15:41 +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > I found this during working on the file and actually saw no live issues > (belonged to another series which I just split up). > > I don't think it is a big issue but wanted the writes to the > rtnl_msg_handlers array to be strictly serialized. I was working on > adding this to other places, too. Maybe better for net-next even?
Sure, and you probably could enforce an ASSERT_RTNL() in rtnl_register() to catch all offenders.
