On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 09:45 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Aye. In that case, what about using tail instead of end?
What do you mean exactly ? > Because > accounting for something that we have to tweak the limits to accept is > like adding a constant to both sides of the equation. > But perhaps that would cut out too much of the fat which could be used > later by the stack. Are you facing a particular problem with current code ? I am working to reduce the SACK at their source (the receiver), instead of trying to filter them when they had to travel all the way back to TCP sender.
