Hi,
Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> From: Maciej Żenczykowski <m...@google.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <m...@google.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index 2f1f5d439788..11fa1a5564d4 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -6044,8 +6044,14 @@ static int __addrconf_sysctl_register(struct net *net,
> char *dev_name,
>
> for (i = 0; table[i].data; i++) {
> table[i].data += (char *)p - (char *)&ipv6_devconf;
> - table[i].extra1 = idev; /* embedded; no ref */
> - table[i].extra2 = net;
> + /* If one of these is already set, then it is not safe to
> + * overwrite either of them: this makes proc_dointvec_minmax
> + * usable.
> + */
> + if (!table[i].extra1 && !table[i].extra2) {
> + table[i].extra1 = idev; /* embedded; no ref */
> + table[i].extra2 = net;
> + }
> }
>
> snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "net/ipv6/conf/%s", dev_name);
>
This seems nothing to do with the RFC7559 changes.
Why don't you submit this as a separate patch?
--
Hideaki Yoshifuji <hideaki.yoshif...@miraclelinux.com>
Technical Division, MIRACLE LINUX CORPORATION
