From: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:39:34 +0200
> Any reason why dev_forward_skb() is not preferred over direct > netif_receive_skb() you're using? It would, for example, implicitly > assure that pkt_type is always PACKET_HOST, etc. dev_forward_skb() will pull the ethernet header. And since a direct call to netif_receive_skb() will not, one of these two choices won't work properly.
