On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 01:21:27AM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torok...@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:46:05 -0700 > > > Hi David, > > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Dmitry Torokhov > > <dmitry.torok...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If net namespace is attached to a user namespace let's make container's > >> root owner of sysctls affecting said network namespace instead of global > >> root. > >> > >> This also allows us to clean up net_ctl_permissions() because we do not > >> need to fudge permissions anymore for the container's owner since it now > >> owns the objects in question. > >> > >> Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebied...@xmission.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torok...@gmail.com> > > > > I was looking at linux-next today, and I noticed that, when you merged > > my patch, you basically reverted the following commit: > > > > commit d6e0d306449bcb5fa3c80e7a3edf11d45abf9ae9 > > Author: Tyler Hicks <tyhi...@canonical.com> > > Date: Thu Jun 2 23:43:22 2016 -0500 > > > > net: Use ns_capable_noaudit() when determining net sysctl permissions > > Please send me a fixup patch for this, sorry.
Just did, look for <20160930222431.GA30208@dtor-ws> Thanks. -- Dmitry
