On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 11:40:16AM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> The prsctp polices include ttl expires policy already, we should remove
> the old ttl expires codes, and just adjust the new polices' codes to be
> compatible with the old one for users.
>
> This patch is to remove all the old expires codes, and if prsctp polices
> are not set, it will still set msg's expires_at and check the expires in
> sctp_check_abandoned.
>
> Note that asoc->prsctp_enable is set by default, so users can't feel any
> difference even if they use the old expires api in userspace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien....@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leit...@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/net/sctp/structs.h | 1 -
> net/sctp/chunk.c | 32 ++++++++------------------------
> net/sctp/output.c | 3 ---
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> index 11c3bf2..61732e9 100644
> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> @@ -530,7 +530,6 @@ struct sctp_datamsg {
> /* Did the messenge fail to send? */
> int send_error;
> u8 send_failed:1,
> - can_abandon:1, /* can chunks from this message can be abandoned. */
> can_delay; /* should this message be Nagle delayed */
> };
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/chunk.c b/net/sctp/chunk.c
> index 7a1cdf4..615f0dd 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/chunk.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/chunk.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ static void sctp_datamsg_init(struct sctp_datamsg *msg)
> atomic_set(&msg->refcnt, 1);
> msg->send_failed = 0;
> msg->send_error = 0;
> - msg->can_abandon = 0;
> msg->can_delay = 1;
> msg->expires_at = 0;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msg->chunks);
> @@ -182,20 +181,11 @@ struct sctp_datamsg *sctp_datamsg_from_user(struct
> sctp_association *asoc,
> /* Note: Calculate this outside of the loop, so that all fragments
> * have the same expiration.
> */
> - if (sinfo->sinfo_timetolive) {
> - /* sinfo_timetolive is in milliseconds */
> + if (asoc->peer.prsctp_capable && sinfo->sinfo_timetolive &&
> + (SCTP_PR_TTL_ENABLED(sinfo->sinfo_flags) ||
> + !SCTP_PR_POLICY(sinfo->sinfo_flags)))
> msg->expires_at = jiffies +
> msecs_to_jiffies(sinfo->sinfo_timetolive);
> - msg->can_abandon = 1;
> -
> - pr_debug("%s: msg:%p expires_at:%ld jiffies:%ld\n", __func__,
> - msg, msg->expires_at, jiffies);
> - }
> -
> - if (asoc->peer.prsctp_capable &&
> - SCTP_PR_TTL_ENABLED(sinfo->sinfo_flags))
> - msg->expires_at =
> - jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(sinfo->sinfo_timetolive);
>
> /* This is the biggest possible DATA chunk that can fit into
> * the packet
> @@ -354,18 +344,8 @@ errout:
> /* Check whether this message has expired. */
> int sctp_chunk_abandoned(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
> {
> - if (!chunk->asoc->peer.prsctp_capable ||
> - !SCTP_PR_POLICY(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags)) {
> - struct sctp_datamsg *msg = chunk->msg;
> -
> - if (!msg->can_abandon)
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (time_after(jiffies, msg->expires_at))
> - return 1;
> -
> + if (!chunk->asoc->peer.prsctp_capable)
> return 0;
> - }
>
> if (SCTP_PR_TTL_ENABLED(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) &&
> time_after(jiffies, chunk->msg->expires_at)) {
> @@ -378,6 +358,10 @@ int sctp_chunk_abandoned(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
> chunk->sent_count > chunk->sinfo.sinfo_timetolive) {
> chunk->asoc->abandoned_sent[SCTP_PR_INDEX(RTX)]++;
> return 1;
> + } else if (!SCTP_PR_POLICY(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) &&
> + chunk->msg->expires_at &&
> + time_after(jiffies, chunk->msg->expires_at)) {
> + return 1;
> }
> /* PRIO policy is processed by sendmsg, not here */
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/output.c b/net/sctp/output.c
> index 2a5c189..f0af831 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/output.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/output.c
> @@ -865,9 +865,6 @@ static void sctp_packet_append_data(struct sctp_packet
> *packet,
> rwnd = 0;
>
> asoc->peer.rwnd = rwnd;
> - /* Has been accepted for transmission. */
> - if (!asoc->peer.prsctp_capable)
> - chunk->msg->can_abandon = 0;
> sctp_chunk_assign_tsn(chunk);
> sctp_chunk_assign_ssn(chunk);
> }
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
