On Mon, 2016-10-17 at 15:29 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Sowmini Varadhan
> <sowmini.varad...@oracle.com> wrote:
> > 
> > For some Tx paths (e.g., tpacket_snd()), ixgbe_atr may be
> > passed down an sk_buff that has the network and transport
> > header in the paged data, so it needs to make sure these
> > headers are available in the headlen bytes to calculate the
> > l4_proto.
> > 
> > This patch expect that network and transport headers are
> > already available in the non-paged header dat.  The assumption
> > is that the caller has set this up if l4_proto based Tx
> > steering is desired.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varad...@oracle.com>
> 
> This all looks correct to me.  I would recommend having Jeff pull it
> in to be submitted to the net queue.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.du...@intel.com>

Sowmini, can you re-submit this to intel-wired-lan but without the RFC in
the title?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to