On 10/18/16 9:46 AM, David Miller wrote:
> Series applied, but the recursion is disappointing.
> If we run into problems due to kernel stack depth because of this with
> some configurations (reasonable or not, if we allow it then it can't
> crash the kernel), we will either need to find a way to make this walk
> iterative or revert these changes.
Since 4.9 is tagged as the next LTS I would like to see the series applied to
it at some point - assuming no problems show up with wider exposure in net-next.