On 10/18/16 9:46 AM, David Miller wrote: > Series applied, but the recursion is disappointing. > > If we run into problems due to kernel stack depth because of this with > some configurations (reasonable or not, if we allow it then it can't > crash the kernel), we will either need to find a way to make this walk > iterative or revert these changes.
understood. Since 4.9 is tagged as the next LTS I would like to see the series applied to it at some point - assuming no problems show up with wider exposure in net-next.
