On 10/19/2016 05:15 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 10/19/2016 07:31 AM, William Tu wrote:
...
-     if (copy_to_user(uvalue, value, value_size) != 0)
+     if (copy_to_user(uvalue, value, min_t(u32, usize, value_size)) != 0)
               goto free_value;

I think such approach won't actually fix anything. User space
may lose some of the values and won't have any idea what was lost.
I think we need to fix sample code to avoid using sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF)
and use /sys/devices/system/cpu/possible instead.
I would argue that glibc should be fixed as well since relying on
ls -d /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu[0-9]*|wc -l turned out to be incorrect.

Thanks for the feedback. I think glibc is correct. The
_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF presents the number of processors
configured/populated and is indeed "ls
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu[0-9]*|wc -l". This means the actual number
of CPUs installed on your system. On the other hand, the

In glibc __get_nprocs_conf() seems to try a number of things, first it
tries equivalent of /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu[0-9]*|wc -l, if that fails,
depending on the config, it either tries to count cpus in /proc/cpuinfo,
or returns the _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN value instead. If /proc/cpuinfo has
some issue, it returns just 1 worst case. _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN will parse
/sys/devices/system/cpu/online, if that fails it looks into /proc/stat
for cpuX entries, and if also that fails for some reason, /proc/cpuinfo
is consulted (and returning 1 if unlikely all breaks down).

num_possible_cpus() includes both the installed CPUs and the empty CPU
socket/slot, in order to support CPU hotplug.

Correct.

As a example, one of my dual socket motherboard with 1 CPU installed has
# /sys/devices/system/cpu/possible
0-239
# /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu[0-9]*|wc -l
12
Note that these 12 cpus could be online/offline by
# echo 1/0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/online
Even if it is offline, the entry is still there.

Thinking about another solution, maybe we should use
"num_present_cpus()" which means the configured/populated CPUs and the
value is the same as sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF). Consider:
1) cpuX is online/offline: the num_present_cpus() remains the same.
2) new cpu is hotplug into the empty socket: the num_present_cpus()
gets updates, and also the sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF).

+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)

         if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH ||
             map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY)
-               value_size = round_up(map->value_size, 8) * num_possible_cpus();
+               value_size = round_up(map->value_size, 8) * num_present_cpus();
         else
                 value_size = map->value_size;

But as you say in 2) that also has a chance of being racy on CPU hotplug
compared to num_possible_cpus() which is fixed at boot time.

Documentation/cputopology.txt +106 says /sys/devices/system/cpu/possible
outputs cpu_possible_mask. That is the same as in num_possible_cpus(), so
first step would be to fix the buggy example code, imho.

What perhaps could be done in a second step to reduce overhead is an option
for bpf(2) to pass in a cpu mask similarly as for sched_{get,set}affinity()
syscalls, where user space can construct a mask via CPU_SET(3). For the
syscall time, kernel would lock hot plugging via get_online_cpus() and
put_online_cpus(), it would check whether passed CPUs are online to query
and if so then it would copy the values into the user provided buffer. I'd
think this might be useful in a number of ways anyway.

Maybe something like this as mentioned first step to fix the examples. Does
this work for you, William?

 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
index ee384f0..d4832e8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
@@ -25,6 +25,33 @@

 static int map_flags;

+static unsigned int num_possible_cpus(void)
+{
+       static const char *fcpu = "/sys/devices/system/cpu/possible";
+       unsigned int val, possible_cpus = 0;
+       char buff[128];
+       FILE *fp;
+
+       fp = fopen(fcpu, "r");
+       if (!fp) {
+               printf("Failed to open %s: '%s'!\n", fcpu, strerror(errno));
+               exit(1);
+       }
+
+       while (fgets(buff, sizeof(buff), fp)) {
+               if (sscanf(buff, "%*u-%u", &val) == 1)
+                       possible_cpus = val;
+       }
+
+       fclose(fp);
+       if (!possible_cpus) {
+               printf("Failed to retrieve # possible CPUs!\n");
+               exit(1);
+       }
+
+       return possible_cpus;
+}
+
 static void test_hashmap(int task, void *data)
 {
        long long key, next_key, value;
@@ -110,7 +137,7 @@ static void test_hashmap(int task, void *data)

 static void test_hashmap_percpu(int task, void *data)
 {
-       unsigned int nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF);
+       unsigned int nr_cpus = num_possible_cpus();
        long long value[nr_cpus];
        long long key, next_key;
        int expected_key_mask = 0;
@@ -258,7 +285,7 @@ static void test_arraymap(int task, void *data)

 static void test_arraymap_percpu(int task, void *data)
 {
-       unsigned int nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF);
+       unsigned int nr_cpus = num_possible_cpus();
        int key, next_key, fd, i;
        long values[nr_cpus];

@@ -313,7 +340,7 @@ static void test_arraymap_percpu(int task, void *data)

 static void test_arraymap_percpu_many_keys(void)
 {
-       unsigned int nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF);
+       unsigned int nr_cpus = num_possible_cpus();
        unsigned int nr_keys = 20000;
        long values[nr_cpus];
        int key, fd, i;
--
1.9.3

Reply via email to