Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> writes:
> A bugfix added a sanity check around the assignment and use of the
> 'is_11d' variable, which looks correct to me, but as the function is
> rather complex already, this confuses the compiler to the point where
> it can no longer figure out if the variable is always initialized
> correctly:
>
> brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c: In function ‘brcmf_cfg80211_start_ap’:
> brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c:4586:10: error: ‘is_11d’ may be used
> uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>
> This adds an initialization for the newly introduced case in which
> the variable should not really be used, in order to make the warning
> go away.
>
> Fixes: b3589dfe0212 ("brcmfmac: ignore 11d configuration errors")
> Cc: Hante Meuleman <hante.meule...@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Kalle Valo <kv...@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Via which tree are you planning to submit this? Should I take it?
--
Kalle Valo
