On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 02:50:39PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 10/26/2016 12:36 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
> > Add support for the variant of amac hardware present in the Broadcom
> > Northstar2 based SoCs. Northstar2 requires an additional register to be
> > configured with the port speed/duplexity (NICPM). This can be added to
> > the link callback to hide it from the instances that do not use this.
> > Also, the bgmac_chip_reset() was intentionally removed to prevent the
> > resetting of the chip to the default values on open. Finally, clearing
> > of the pending interrupts on init is required due to observed issues on
> > some platforms.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jon.ma...@broadcom.com>
> > ---
>
> > +static void bgmac_nicpm_speed_set(struct net_device *net_dev)
> > +{
> > + struct bgmac *bgmac = netdev_priv(net_dev);
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + if (!bgmac->plat.nicpm_base)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + val = NICPM_IOMUX_CTRL_INIT_VAL;
> > + switch (bgmac->net_dev->phydev->speed) {
> > + default:
> > + pr_err("Unsupported speed. Defaulting to 1000Mb\n");
> > + case SPEED_1000:
> > + val |= NICPM_IOMUX_CTRL_SPD_1000M << NICPM_IOMUX_CTRL_SPD_SHIFT;
> > + break;
> > + case SPEED_100:
> > + val |= NICPM_IOMUX_CTRL_SPD_100M << NICPM_IOMUX_CTRL_SPD_SHIFT;
> > + break;
> > + case SPEED_10:
> > + val |= NICPM_IOMUX_CTRL_SPD_10M << NICPM_IOMUX_CTRL_SPD_SHIFT;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + writel(val, bgmac->plat.nicpm_base + NICPM_IOMUX_CTRL);
> > +
> > + usleep_range(10, 100);
>
> Does not seem like a good idea, do you need that sleep?
Oops, that's not supposed to be there. Removed.
> > +
> > + bgmac_adjust_link(bgmac->net_dev);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int platform_phy_connect(struct bgmac *bgmac)
> > {
> > struct phy_device *phy_dev;
> >
> > - phy_dev = of_phy_get_and_connect(bgmac->net_dev, bgmac->dev->of_node,
> > - bgmac_adjust_link);
> > + if (bgmac->plat.nicpm_base)
> > + phy_dev = of_phy_get_and_connect(bgmac->net_dev,
> > + bgmac->dev->of_node,
> > + bgmac_nicpm_speed_set);
> > + else
> > + phy_dev = of_phy_get_and_connect(bgmac->net_dev,
> > + bgmac->dev->of_node,
> > + bgmac_adjust_link);
> > if (!phy_dev) {
> > dev_err(bgmac->dev, "Phy connect failed\n");
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> >
> > + if (bgmac->feature_flags & BGMAC_FEAT_LANE_SWAP)
> > + phy_dev->dev_flags |= PHY_BRCM_EXP_LANE_SWAP;
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -140,6 +188,9 @@ static int bgmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bgmac);
> >
> > + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "brcm,enet-phy-lane-swap"))
> > + bgmac->feature_flags |= BGMAC_FEAT_LANE_SWAP;
> > +
> > /* Set the features of the 4707 family */
> > bgmac->feature_flags |= BGMAC_FEAT_CLKCTLST;
> > bgmac->feature_flags |= BGMAC_FEAT_NO_RESET;
> > @@ -182,6 +233,14 @@ static int bgmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > if (IS_ERR(bgmac->plat.idm_base))
> > return PTR_ERR(bgmac->plat.idm_base);
> >
> > + regs = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "nicpm_base");
> > + if (regs) {
> > + bgmac->plat.nicpm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev,
> > + regs);
> > + if (IS_ERR(bgmac->plat.nicpm_base))
> > + return PTR_ERR(bgmac->plat.nicpm_base);
> > + }
> > +
> > bgmac->read = platform_bgmac_read;
> > bgmac->write = platform_bgmac_write;
> > bgmac->idm_read = platform_bgmac_idm_read;
> > @@ -213,6 +272,7 @@ static int bgmac_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > static const struct of_device_id bgmac_of_enet_match[] = {
> > {.compatible = "brcm,amac",},
> > {.compatible = "brcm,nsp-amac",},
> > + {.compatible = "brcm,ns2-amac",},
> > {},
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
> > index 38876ec..1796208 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
> > @@ -1082,6 +1082,9 @@ static void bgmac_enable(struct bgmac *bgmac)
> > /* http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/mac-gbit/gmac/chipinit */
> > static void bgmac_chip_init(struct bgmac *bgmac)
> > {
> > + /* Clear any erroneously pending interrupts */
> > + bgmac_write(bgmac, BGMAC_INT_STATUS, ~0);
> > +
> > /* 1 interrupt per received frame */
> > bgmac_write(bgmac, BGMAC_INT_RECV_LAZY, 1 << BGMAC_IRL_FC_SHIFT);
> >
> > @@ -1158,8 +1161,6 @@ static int bgmac_open(struct net_device *net_dev)
> > struct bgmac *bgmac = netdev_priv(net_dev);
> > int err = 0;
> >
> > - bgmac_chip_reset(bgmac);
> > -
>
> Is this removal intentional? Maybe it should be special cased with
> checking for a NS2 BGMAC instance and not do it in that case?
The reset seems completely unnecessary. There is already 2 resets in
the probe routine, another reset serves no purpose. I can add it
back, as it does not seem to have the negative effect I was seeing
before.
Of course, if I remove this one I should remove the reset in the close
too (which seems even more unnecessary, but I didn't remove it).
Thanks,
Jon
> --
> Florian
