On 01.12.2016 21:54, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:40:48PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>> On 01.12.2016 21:04, David Miller wrote:
>>> Hannes and Ido,
>>> It looks like we are very close to having this in mergable shape, can
>>> you guys work out this final issue and figure out if it really is
>>> a merge stopped or not?
>> Sure, if the fib notification register could be done under protection of
>> the sequence counter I don't see any more problems.
> Did you maybe miss my reply yesterday? Because I was trying to
> understand what "ordering" you're referring to, but didn't receive a
> reply from you.
Oh, strange, I am pretty sure I replied to that. Let me resend it.
>> The sync handler is nice to have and can be done in a later patch series.
> Sync handler?
I was talking about SWITCHDEV_SYNC.