Could we please kill that kludge? "af_unix: use freezable blocking
calls in read" had been wrong to start with; having a method make assumptions
of that sort ("nobody will call me while holding locks I hadn't thought of")
is asking for serious trouble. splice is just a place where lockdep has
caught that - we *can't* assume that nobody will ever call kernel_recvmsg()
while holding some locks.
I've run into that converting AF_UNIX to generic_file_splice_read();
I can kludge around that ("freezable unless ->msg_iter is ITER_PIPE"), but
that only delays trouble.
Note that the only other user of freezable_schedule_timeout() is
a very different story - it's a kernel thread, which *does* have a guaranteed
locking environment. Making such assumptions in unix_stream_recvmsg(),
OTOH, is insane...
