On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 02:06:32PM +0100, Volodymyr Bendiuga wrote:
> Westermo devices use this address.
I think we can have a better change log entry than that. How about:
Some devices, such as the mv88e6097 do have ADDR[0] external and so it
is possible to configure the device to use SMI address 0x1. Remove the
restriction, as there are boards using this address.
Thanks
Andrew
>
> Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Bendiuga <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> index 4212fb6..05942e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> @@ -4253,10 +4253,6 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_phy_destroy(struct
> mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
> static int mv88e6xxx_smi_init(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
> struct mii_bus *bus, int sw_addr)
> {
> - /* ADDR[0] pin is unavailable externally and considered zero */
> - if (sw_addr & 0x1)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> if (sw_addr == 0)
> chip->smi_ops = &mv88e6xxx_smi_single_chip_ops;
> else if (mv88e6xxx_has(chip, MV88E6XXX_FLAGS_MULTI_CHIP))
> --
> 2.7.4
>
