On 12/09/2016 01:48 AM, Selvin Xavier wrote:
> This patch implements support for create_cq, destroy_cq and req_notify_cq
> verbs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eddie Wai <eddie....@broadcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Devesh Sharma <devesh.sha...@broadcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.ko...@broadcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sriharsha Basavapatna <sriharsha.basavapa...@broadcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Selvin Xavier <selvin.xav...@broadcom.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxtre/bnxt_qplib_fp.c | 183
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxtre/bnxt_qplib_fp.h | 47 ++++++
> drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxtre/bnxt_re_ib_verbs.c | 154 ++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxtre/bnxt_re_ib_verbs.h | 19 +++
> drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxtre/bnxt_re_main.c | 4 +
> include/uapi/rdma/bnxt_re_uverbs_abi.h | 11 ++
> 6 files changed, 418 insertions(+)
Something I just realized is this patch series does not modify the
MAINTAINERS file. Whom from Broadcom will be maintaining this driver?
Probably want to include this info in the v3 series
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxtre/bnxt_re_ib_verbs.c
> b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxtre/bnxt_re_ib_verbs.c
> index 3417829..f316598 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxtre/bnxt_re_ib_verbs.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxtre/bnxt_re_ib_verbs.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,16 @@
> #include "bnxt_re_ib_verbs.h"
> #include <rdma/bnxt_re_uverbs_abi.h>
>
> +static int bnxt_re_copy_to_udata(struct bnxt_re_dev *rdev, void *data, int
> len,
> + struct ib_udata *udata)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = ib_copy_to_udata(udata, data, len);
> +
> + return rc ? -EFAULT : 0;
> +}
This function seems to provide no value by wrapping ib_copy_to_udata,
any reason to keep it? From the two call sites for this function it
appears it can be replaced with a direct call to ib_copy_to_udata.
