From: Hayes Wang <hayesw...@realtek.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:38:30 +0800

> v3:
> simply the argument for patch #3. Replace &tp->napi with napi.
> 
> v2:
> Add smp_mb__after_atomic() for patch #1.
> 
> v1:
> Scheduling the napi during the following periods would let it be ignored.
> And the events wouldn't be handled until next napi_schedule() is called.
> 
> 1. after napi_disable and before napi_enable().
> 2. after all actions of napi function is completed and before calling
>    napi_complete().
> 
> If no next napi_schedule() is called, tx or rx would stop working.
> 
> In order to avoid these situations, the followings solutions are applied.
> 
> 1. prevent start_xmit() from calling napi_schedule() during runtime suspend
>    or after napi_disable().
> 2. re-schedule the napi for tx if it is necessary.
> 3. check if any rx is finished or not after napi_enable().

Series applied.

Reply via email to