On 02/14/2017 12:02 AM, Alexander Alemayhu wrote:
Fixes the following warnings:

kernel/bpf/verifier.c: In function ‘may_access_direct_pkt_data’:
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:702:6: warning: this statement may fall through 
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
    if (t == BPF_WRITE)
       ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:704:2: note: here
   case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS:
   ^~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c: In function ‘reg_set_min_max_inv’:
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2057:23: warning: this statement may fall through 
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
    true_reg->min_value = 0;
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2058:2: note: here
   case BPF_JSGT:
   ^~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2068:23: warning: this statement may fall through 
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
    true_reg->min_value = 0;
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2069:2: note: here
   case BPF_JSGE:
   ^~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c: In function ‘reg_set_min_max’:
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2009:24: warning: this statement may fall through 
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
    false_reg->min_value = 0;
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2010:2: note: here
   case BPF_JSGT:
   ^~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2019:24: warning: this statement may fall through 
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
    false_reg->min_value = 0;
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2020:2: note: here
   case BPF_JSGE:
   ^~~~

Reported-by: David Binderman <dcb...@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Alemayhu <alexan...@alemayhu.com>

These fall-through comments are fine for net-next tree.

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>

Reply via email to