If rose_route_frame return success we'll dereference a stale pointer.
Likely this is only going to result in bad statistics for the ROSE
interface.

This fixes coverity 946.

Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---
 net/rose/rose_dev.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-net/net/rose/rose_dev.c
===================================================================
--- linux-net.orig/net/rose/rose_dev.c  2006-06-23 22:40:27.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-net/net/rose/rose_dev.c       2006-06-23 22:42:56.000000000 +0100
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static int rose_rebuild_header(struct sk
        struct net_device_stats *stats = netdev_priv(dev);
        unsigned char *bp = (unsigned char *)skb->data;
        struct sk_buff *skbn;
+       unsigned int len;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_INET
        if (arp_find(bp + 7, skb)) {
@@ -76,6 +77,8 @@ static int rose_rebuild_header(struct sk
 
        kfree_skb(skb);
 
+       len = skbn->len;
+
        if (!rose_route_frame(skbn, NULL)) {
                kfree_skb(skbn);
                stats->tx_errors++;
@@ -83,7 +86,7 @@ static int rose_rebuild_header(struct sk
        }
 
        stats->tx_packets++;
-       stats->tx_bytes += skbn->len;
+       stats->tx_bytes += len;
 #endif
        return 1;
 }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to